If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

Pssst. We also have a podcast… find that here on your favourite podcast player or here on YouTube 🙏

💬Simon's Market Readout – Wells Fargo brings tokenized deposits to corporate clients this fall, years behind HSBC, Citi and JPMorgan. Kraken's xStocks holders can now vote their shares. Top-down and bottom-up tokenization are both coming, and nobody knows where they meet.

📰 Stories You Can't Miss - Western Union ships its stablecoin card in 37 markets with under $10m of USDPT in circulation, six days after Kulipa switched off 120k cards. BlackRock tokenizes 12 share classes across six UCITS money market funds. And Mastercard tests whether a compliance check done once at origination can travel downstream.

This newsletter is sponsored by M0!

Most stablecoin platforms give you one stack, one issuer, no choices.

M0 is modular. Choose your regulated issuer. Design how your stablecoin behaves. Change anything as your business evolves.

Your stablecoin, your stack, built around your business

Learn more at m0.org.

Two stories this week that are far more interesting together than apart.

1. Wells Fargo is late, and that's the point

Wells Fargo is introducing tokenized deposits for corporate and commercial clients, letting them move and settle funds 24/7. It starts this fall with a single USD to GBP corridor for selected clients, widening to more clients, countries and currencies across 2027.

You'd immediately go, "Simon, they're just joining the party, right? HSBC, Citi and JPMorgan have been way out in front of this." And yes, that's true. But Wells Fargo getting there late is a) very much a Wells Fargo thing to do, and b) a sign that everybody ends up here.

Now set that against the Swift Ledger, live since July, and the ability to swap tokenized deposits between multiple institutions and multiple clearing networks, the TCH network, CLS and many others. Wells Fargo has said its platform will be compatible with the industry tokenized deposit network due next year. We are heading to a world where these services become the backbone of a new 24/7 infrastructure for banking. Running alongside it is a shadow banking infrastructure of stablecoins that is also 24/7, and these two things continue to collide. They will also collide with other assets.

2. Tokenized stocks start behaving like stocks

So consider story number two. Kraken parent Payward is enabling proxy voting on its tokenized equities. Hold xStocks until now and you got the price exposure but no say in the company. Through a partnership with Broadridge, eligible holders can submit voting preferences on the underlying shares.

What does this mean? Tokenized stocks look more and more like stocks. Except they're 24/7, they're global, and they're available to anybody with compatible software.

That opens your market dramatically as a fintech business, in terms of the geographies you can serve. It also makes the asset programmable. Look at Robinhood Chain, which went to mainnet last month. Stock Tokens can be posted as DeFi collateral in 120-plus countries, so I can borrow against my stocks for a deposit on a house without selling them. Not if I'm American, though, where that use is switched off.

This is really bringing the stuff that used to only happen for the most sophisticated large corporates, or the most sophisticated high net worth individuals, and making it available to everybody. And all of that has to collide with the DTCC, who are also rolling out their infrastructure.

So what's the insight here?

Top-down tokenization is coming. Bottom-up tokenization is coming. The only thing we don't know is where these two start to meet in the middle.

Western Union told investors in April that its stablecoin card would arrive late in 2026 across “dozens of markets.” It shipped on August 4 in 37 markets, with more than 60 targeted by December.

At launch, less than $10 million of USDPT was in circulation. For scale reference, Western Union moved $107.4 billion of cross-border principal in 2025.

The consumer product arrived before the stablecoin achieved scale.

The deployment beat the schedule, and beat the float. That is the execution update to our April story.

Six days before Stablecard launched, Kulipa, a stablecoin card infrastructure provider, stopped operating. The episode showed what happens when a wallet or fintech depends on one specialist company to turn an onchain balance into something customers can spend.

Self-custody protected the money, not payment continuity. Ready and Solflare customers kept their assets because funds were pulled from self-custody at authorisation. Their cards still stopped working.

Western Union owns the USDPT brand and the reserve economics, while outsourcing the token issuance to Anchorage, and card and wallet issuance to Rain. Western Union controls the product and its economics, but not the two operating layers that make it usable.

Now Rain and Anchorage are not Kulipa. Rain has raised more than $338 million and was valued at $1.95 billion in January. Anchorage has operated as an OCC-chartered national trust bank for more than five years. These are better-capitalised, more established counterparties.

That lowers the probability of failure. It does not remove the dependency.

The diligence questions are practical. Does anyone hold customer value between authorisation and settlement? Who controls the BIN and card credentials if the issuer stops answering? How quickly can the programme move without replacing every card?

That dependency sits beside the commercial opportunity. Rain describes its programmes as credit products and says this produces higher merchant acceptance and more interchange for partners. Western Union has disclosed no credit limits, interest terms, fees or revenue split, so we cannot yet say how much of that economics reaches the programme sponsor.

The next test is whether Western Union changes Rain’s growth profile.

Rain’s recent growth has come from larger settlement volumes, not a broader address base. Paymentscan’s addresses are not users. But if its methodology remains consistent, Stablecard gives us a useful signal.

By November, Stablecard should show up in Rain’s address and transaction counts. If it does not, Western Union has shipped reach, not adoption.

BlackRock has launched 12 tokenized share classes across six Irish-domiciled UCITS money market funds covering sterling, euro and dollar liquidity.

This is not $311 billion moving onchain. The six funds managed a combined $311 billion at the end of June. BlackRock has added blockchain-based share classes to funds institutional investors already use.

The better reference point is October 2023. BlackRock and JPMorgan then tokenized money market fund shares and transferred them to Barclays to meet collateral requirements on a live derivatives trade.

This week, a one-off collateral transaction became a product investors can hold from the start.

BlackRock has made tokenized collateral available before the collateral call arrives.

In the 2023 Barclays transaction, BlackRock fund shares were tokenized when they were needed. Investors can now subscribe directly into a tokenized share class and hold the position in a form that can transfer between approved wallets.

A treasury team no longer needs to begin the tokenization process after a collateral request arrives. It can hold an income-producing money market fund in transferable form before the transaction exists.

The product is not a new source of yield. It is a faster way to mobilize an existing liquidity asset. The underlying exposure remains a regulated money market fund. The token changes how the shares can be moved, pledged or substituted without requiring the investor to redeem into cash first.

BlackRock also had a live example of the more aggressive architecture available, but chose a conservative one. Baillie Gifford’s BAGEY fund provides the architectural contrast. BAGEY placed the legal register natively onchain under the UK’s PS26/7 framework. BlackRock kept the ICS register with JPMorgan and added tokenized share classes around it. Two launches within weeks of each other chose opposite models, with BlackRock applying the more conservative architecture  to the far larger fund range.

BlackRock’s recent launches also show how it selects a tokenization provider.

For existing funds, the mandate stayed with the institution already responsible for the shareholder record.

BSTBL added an Ethereum-based onchain class to an existing US Treasury liquidity fund. BNY acts as transfer agent and tokenization provider, and BNY Mellon Investment Servicing was already the registered transfer agent for that fund complex.

The European ICS launch follows the same model. JPMorgan has maintained the register since 2010, so Kinexys was added to an existing servicing relationship.

New funds followed a different route. BlackRock launched BRSRV as a new multichain vehicle and appointed Securitize as transfer agent and tokenization provider from the outset. BUIDL uses the same division of responsibilities: Securitize controls the transfer agency and tokenization layer, while BNY provides custody and fund administration.

Across BlackRock’s four products, the tokenization mandate followed the servicing mandate. It did not create one.

Where a legal register already existed, BlackRock used the institution that controlled it. Where BlackRock created a new onchain fund, it appointed Securitize to build and maintain that register from day one.

This changes the competitive reading of the tokenized-fund market.

Securitize, Superstate and Figure have argued that native issuance and public-chain expertise are the moat. That remains true for funds designed around onchain distribution. Existing fund complexes create a different contest.

The transfer agent already controls subscriptions, redemptions, shareholder servicing and the legal record of ownership. Adding blockchain functionality to that position is easier than moving the register to a new provider.

For existing funds, the defensible position is the administration agreement, not the tokenization stack.

The metric to watch is not how much of the $311 billion receives a token. It is whether investors choose the tokenized class before they have collateral to post.

In 2023, BlackRock and JPMorgan proved the shares could move when required. They are now testing whether institutions will hold them ready to move by default.

Every time a stablecoin payment provider adds a counterparty, it repeats the verification work. Mastercard and Borderless.xyz are testing whether a check completed at origination can be reused downstream across a network of PSPs.

They are doing it through Mastercard Crypto Credential, Mastercard’s framework for verifying participants and passing standardized identity and compliance-assurance signals between crypto service providers.

Mastercard is positioning Crypto Credential as the rulebook for stablecoin rails it does not operate.

The originator verifies the customer once. Crypto Credential confirms that the provider followed Mastercard’s standards, and downstream PSPs use that assurance signal in their own approval and risk processes. The model could reduce repeated document collection, counterparty reviews and bilateral onboarding.

FATF Recommendation 17 allows a PSP to rely on another institution’s customer due diligence, but it does not transfer accountability. Crypto Credential may reduce duplicated checks across the network, while each downstream provider remains responsible for the transactions it approves.

That leaves Mastercard solving an implementation problem rather than a legislative one. Travel Rule legislation has now passed in 91 of the 109 jurisdictions that answered FATF's Travel Rule questions, up from 85 of 117 a year earlier. Yet 55 of those 91 had not issued findings or directives or taken Travel Rule-focused enforcement or supervisory action.

Nor does the industry lack a data standard. For instance, IVMS 101 already gives the industry a common language for exchanging originator and beneficiary information. Mastercard’s Crypto Credential is aimed at a different gap - not the format of the message, but whether the counterparty sending it can be trusted.

Card networks earned their position because chargebacks and scheme rules allocate losses when verification fails. The pilot announcement discloses no indemnity or liability shift. Without one, Crypto Credential is a useful data feed with a powerful logo, not yet a network standard.

Mastercard becomes a standard the day its rulebook names who absorbs the loss. Adding pilot participants alone does not get it there.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers