If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

Pssst. We also have a podcast… find that here on your favourite podcast player or here on YouTube 🙏

Welcome to the Tokenized newsletter, brought to you by the creators of the Tokenized Podcast. Written by Simon Taylor of Fintech Brainfood and Shwetabh Sameer of Molten Ventures.

We are the newsletter for institutions that need help preparing for a Tokenized future.

We run through the headlines every week, what it means for you and a market readout. Always with an institutional, business-focused perspective. 

Join us every week as we meet your Tokenization needs.

💬 Simon's Market Readout – Banking-as-a-service is being rebuilt on stablecoin rails — Lightspark's Grid and Tempo's virtual addresses show what happens when payments veterans build natively onchain.

📰 Stories You Can't Miss: Western Union goes vertical with its own Solana stablecoin and 360k-location off-ramp network; Banking Circle wires stablecoin clearing into its €1.5T correspondent platform two weeks after MiCA approval ; and OKX, BlackRock, and Standard Chartered build the institutional trust stack that lets BUIDL work as live trading collateral.

This newsletter is sponsored by M0!

Stablecoins are becoming global financial infrastructure.

Brands partner to issue their own stablecoins with regulated issuers.

Stablecoin issuers want to issue for the most valuable brands.

Both need robust tech.

M0 is the only platform where issuers and brands get together to build stablecoins.

Make your own money. m0.org.

Editor's Note: Simon Taylor, co-creator of Tokenized, works at Tempo. The analysis below represents Simon's perspective on these developments. 

This week it's become abundantly clear to me that it is entirely possible to rebuild a lot of what we used to call banking-as-a-service (BaaS) on stablecoin infrastructure. Two stories stood out.

Story number one: Lightspark, David Marcus's Layer 2 built on top of the Bitcoin network, launched their Grid product. Grid allows any organization to create accounts, deliver yield, and manage pay-ins and pay-outs—all the stuff you'd expect from a classic banking-as-a-service model because it's facing into platforms.

Platforms specifically would have used one of the traditional BaaS providers. They might have used Stripe Treasury, they might have used card services, they might have used an FBO account partnership with a bank underneath. Grid is an alternative model that uses stablecoins instead of the FBO account structure. That's a really interesting way of allowing non-banks to operate without the overhead of dealing with some of the drawbacks those FBO account structures bring.

The other story—near and dear to my heart for obvious reasons—is the launch of virtual addresses on Tempo.

Virtual addresses solve a real problem: there's a lot of potential in stablecoins, but if you want to offer your customers their own stablecoin wallets, you end up having to build quite a lot of capability to manage all of the ledgering. What's my customer's money, what's Alice's money, what's Bob's money, and what's actually my money? How do you separate all of that?

We had a solution for this in TradFi—we called it virtual accounts. It sits on top of a regular bank account and manages all of those little differences. Virtual addresses work exactly the same way. But to do this traditionally on blockchains, you would have had to move money between different wallets and then sweep it back into a master wallet, each time incurring fees, managing the ledgering, and all of the complexity that comes with that. Virtual addresses get around the need to do all of that because you're baking it into the chain itself as a feature.

And I think it's the sort of people who've operated in payments before—David Marcus was the CEO of PayPal, and there's a few of us at Tempo who've been in payments before—combined with the experience of working with on-chain, where the ledger is built for you and you don't have to worry about reconciliation because it just reconciles. That combination is turning this into the financial infrastructure that we always thought it could be.

And that's exciting.

Eight months ago, Western Union's CEO told investors the company was "exploring" a stablecoin — probably via a partner, probably outside the US, probably as a wallet feature. What the company announced on its Q1 earnings call is something materially different: a proprietary dollar-backed token (USDPT), built on Solana, issued by federally chartered Anchorage Digital Bank, with U.S. Bank providing custody — launching next month as a SWIFT alternative for agent settlement across its 360,000-location network. Rather than adopting an existing third-party stablecoin like USDC, Western Union appears to be launching a proprietary-branded stack built with infrastructure partners.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

The real story isn't that Western Union is launching a stablecoin — half the payments industry is doing that. It's that Western Union chose to own the issuance economics rather than plug into someone else's token.

When we covered this in August, CEO Devin McGranahan was explicit about a partnership approach — "in conversations with most major players in the sector." That would have been the safe move, and it's what MoneyGram did with USDC on Stellar and what Remitly did through Bridge.

Instead, Western Union went upstream into issuance economics. USDPT gives the company direct control over reserve float — the same business model that generates the vast majority of Circle's and Tether's income. For a company whose core remittance revenue is contracting, that's a new margin pool that scales with balances rather than transaction volume. If your agent network is going to settle in stablecoins regardless, you'd rather those stablecoins be yours.

The underappreciated piece here in DAN though. If DAN scales, it can turn Western Union's 360k-location physical footprint into crypto-to-fiat off-ramp infrastructure for wallet providers and other partners via API. The Stable Card extends that into what's becoming a standard stablecoin sandwich model:  dollar stability on the backend, local-currency spending on the frontend, blockchain settlement in between. Zepz launched a nearly identical product through Bridge and Visa in December. The difference is distribution: 200 countries and 360,000 agent locations is an advantage few competitors can match, especially in cash-heavy corridors.

The sequencing matters, though. Agent settlement first, consumer products later is operationally disciplined, but it also means the boldest claims — SWIFT alternative, inflation-hedge card, crypto-wallet bridge — won't face real user testing until late 2026 at the earliest. And Solana has now become the preferred option for payment-focused deployments — PayPal, Fiserv, Visa are already there — this is table stakes, not differentiation.

Western Union doesn’t need USDPT to be huge. It needs it to be sticky. A few hundred million outstanding is enough for float to matter — and that’s when Wall Street starts underwriting it.

The correspondent bank that already moves €1.5 trillion a year for 750+ payment companies just wired stablecoins into the same core platform those clients use for cross-border payments, FX, and treasury management. No new vendor relationship, no crypto custody build-out, no separate onboarding flow. Banking Circle S.A., a Luxembourg-licensed credit institution regulated by the CSSF, launched fiat-to-stablecoin and stablecoin-to-fiat settlement on April 27, two weeks after receiving its CASP license under MiCA.

For the payments companies and marketplaces on the other end of that platform, this is closer to enabling a new settlement rail inside a familiar banking environment than onboarding a separate crypto vendor. That distribution advantage is structurally difficult for standalone crypto infrastructure providers to replicate.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

Banking Circle's stablecoin menu deserves closer reading than the launch itself. Including USDG alongside USDC isn't a hedge — it's an economic bet. USDG distributes reserve yield to the platforms that move it, which means Banking Circle could earn on stablecoin balances flowing through its clearing infrastructure, not just on per-transaction fees. That matters, because the margin question hanging over every bank entering stablecoin settlement is the same: if onchain rails are structurally cheaper than correspondent banking, what replaces the revenue you lose on the old pipes? Yield participation on stablecoin float is one answer. It won't fully offset the compression, but it creates a revenue line that didn't exist in the traditional clearing model.

The demand-side picture reinforces why Banking Circle built this as an extension rather than a standalone product. When two-thirds of CFOs say regulatory uncertainty is the main thing holding them back from stablecoins — not performance, not cost — the play is obvious: wrap stablecoin settlement in a regulated bank wrapper and let the existing compliance relationship do the selling. A payments company doesn't need to evaluate a new counterparty's AML programme or explain crypto custody risk to their board. They're already Banking Circle clients. The compliance framework is already in place — and they pick up 24/7 settlement across time zones without a separate integration.

We've been tracking this convergence since October 2025, when a consortium of nine European banks (later named Qivalis) announced plans for a jointly issued euro stablecoin. We noted then that MiCA gives banks a structural advantage — they can service stablecoins using existing balance sheet infrastructure rather than building compliance from scratch. Banking Circle is putting that thesis in production. ClearBank is two weeks ahead of them in the Netherlands. And EQT, which has owned Banking Circle since 2018, now has a stablecoin-enabled clearing bank to shop to potential acquirers — a materially different asset than a pure correspondent banking play.

If recent approvals turn into a broader wave of launches by Q4 2026, stablecoin settlement moves from differentiator to table stakes across the region. The banks that got there first will have already locked in client integrations and begun earning on stablecoin float. The ones still evaluating will be explaining to their boards why they're paying to build what their competitors are already monetising.

Billions of dollars in institutional margin sit on crypto exchanges - most of them earning nothing. OKX, BlackRock, and Standard Chartered just built the framework that lets it earn Treasury yield without leaving the trading floor.

The arrangement, announced April 28, lets eligible institutional and VIP clients on OKX Middle East post BlackRock's BUIDL tokenized Treasury fund as trading collateral. Standard Chartered serves as custodian, holding BUIDL off-exchange while OKX reflects it as usable margin. Clients can also deposit BUIDL directly on-exchange. In both cases, yield from the underlying US Treasuries continues to accrue.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

The headline is yield-bearing collateral. The real story is the trust architecture underneath it.

BlackRock manufactures the asset. Standard Chartered custodies it. OKX provides the trading venue. This isn't a cold start — OKX and Standard Chartered piloted the same collateral-mirroring framework in 2025 with Franklin Templeton's BENJI fund, and BUIDL is the second asset plugged in. That's a three-party institutional stack template others could follow, but only with a right mix of custody, legal and exchange infrastructure.

And it solves a major problem that has kept institutional risk committees from committing real capital to crypto exchanges: custody and counterparty separation. Post-FTX, no institutional allocator wants margin sitting on an exchange balance sheet. This framework means it doesn't have to.

Compare the two models now emerging. In late 2025, we saw Binance routing BUIDL collateral through its own custody affiliate, Ceffu, and banking triparty partners. This is effective, but the custodian is exchange-adjacent. But here in the case of OKX, they brought in an independent G-SIB. For institutional compliance teams evaluating counterparty exposure, that distinction will matter.

We've tracked BUIDL across multiple phases in this newsletter: a) launch as a yield product, b) adoption as a reserve benchmark for stablecoin issuers like Ethena's USDtb, c) regulatory inclusion in the CFTC's collateral pilot in December 2025, and d) now live deployment as exchange margin. Each step moved tokenized Treasuries further from passive holding and closer to active financial infrastructure. Latest estimates suggest ~30% of tokenized Treasuries onchain being actively used as exchange or DeFi collateral rather than sitting in wallets.

The competitive question is sharpening. The advantage in tokenized funds is shifting from yield — which is commoditised, since they all hold the same T-bills — to integration surface area. BUIDL is accepted on four venues, integrated into Aave and Sky (fka MakerDAO), and backing multiple DeFi stablecoins. Hashnote’s USYC (now part of Circle) overtook BUIDL in March 2026 (~$2.9 billion), largely through Binance's BNB Chain integration. JPMorgan's MONY, which we covered at launch in December 2025, flagged collateral utility as a goal — but hasn't publicly appeared in any exchange collateral framework. For a $4 trillion asset management arm, that's a gap worth closing fast.

One risk worth flagging: the IMF cautioned in April 2026 that when the same Treasury-backed token can be margined on exchanges, posted in DeFi lending protocols, and redeemed for the underlying fund unit, stress propagation in a crisis could outpace regulatory response. That's not a reason to stop building — but it is a reason to watch how haircuts, concentration limits, and cross-venue exposure tracking evolve as this market scales.

If tokenized Treasury collateral follows the same adoption curve as stablecoin collateral — where acceptance moved from novel to expected within 18 months — every institutional exchange will face pressure to support BUIDL or an equivalent product by 2027.

The rest will be integrating under pressure.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers