If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!
In This Week's Edition:
💬Simon's Market Readout - Japan wants to put BOJ reserves onchain and settle JGBs around the clock. The 2027 design plan matters more than the early-2030s launch date
📰Stories You Can’t Miss - Coinbase takes US equities into 24/7 DeFi; Standard Chartered builds across stablecoins, deposits and digital debt; 39 state banking associations shop for a shared blockchain; and India prepares a corporate bond pilot settled in wholesale CBDC
This newsletter is sponsored by M0!
Make your own money. m0.org.
Most stablecoin platforms give you one stack, one issuer, no choices.
M0 is modular. Choose your regulated issuer. Design how your stablecoin behaves. Change anything as your business evolves.
Your stablecoin, your stack, built around your business
Learn more at m0.org.
Simon’s Market Readout 💬
A pixelated Simon gives you his market readout for the week.
As if Japanese government bonds weren't interesting enough already, Tokyo now wants to settle them on a blockchain.
Per Nikkei, the Financial Services Agency (FSA), the Ministry of Finance (MoF), the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and a set of financial institutions will form a study group this summer, with a development plan due in early 2027. None of the three agencies has confirmed it publicly, so treat this as reported rather than announced. The goal is to move equities from T+2 and domestic JGB settlement from T+1 to near-instant, around the clock. The mechanism is the part worth reading twice. Japan would tokenize a portion of the current account balances banks hold at the BOJ, putting central bank money onchain as the cash leg. Live operation in the early 2030s.
Early 2027 for the plan, early 2030s for live operation. The first is a few months away, the second is far enough out to file and forget. The design decisions that determine whether any of this interoperates with anything else get made against the near number.
The settlement asset is the unlock, not the ledger. Tokenizing a bond and leaving the cash leg in a legacy RTGS system gets you a nicer database. Putting BOJ reserves onchain gets you atomic delivery-versus-payment (DvP). That is the same problem the Bank of England's Synchronisation Lab and the ECB's Pontes and Appia tracks are circling, and whoever lands it first sets the reference design everyone else integrates against.
Japan is moving regulation and infrastructure as one file. The FSA stood up a dedicated crypto and stablecoin division this month, the FIEA amendments reclassify roughly 105 assets from fiscal 2027, and MUFG, SMBC and Mizuho are already running tokenized JGB and deposit pilots. The study group is a capstone on work already underway, not a standing start.
The G7 has stopped debating whether. Put Japan next to the Bank of England's Digital Securities Sandbox, the ECB's wholesale DLT tracks, and the shared-ledger consortia forming across US banks. I've spent a decade watching Chapter One, where banks discover tokenization. Chapter Two runs 2026 to 2036 and is about scale.
The thing that slips is the far date, and it slips the moment the study group has to choose between building a new chain and connecting the regulated ones Japan already has. That decision sits inside the 2027 plan, which is why the near milestone carries more information than the launch window.
People keep asking where stablecoins went after last year. Scale takes time. Cuy Sheffield, Head of Crypto at Visa, keeps describing stablecoin cards as being in hypergrowth, and exponentials look like nothing right up until they look like everything.
The entire global financial system is about to be tokenized. Some guy once said the revolution would be tokenized. I wonder who that was.
Stories You Can't Miss 📰
🚀 Coinbase Puts 24/7 Tokenized Stocks Into DeFi Collateral Markets.
Coinbase has launched tokenized US equities on Base, starting with Nvidia, Apple, Meta and Alphabet.
The structure answers one of the questions raised when the SpaceX IPO showed the limits of synthetic tokenized stocks (read more here in our Ep. 88 coverage). Coinbase says holders have a direct, senior claim on the underlying equity, with the shares held by Alpaca in regulated, bankruptcy-remote custody. That is closer to direct custody than the synthetic xStocks model.
Once issued, the tokens can move freely between compatible wallets and DeFi applications. They are not restricted to a closed Coinbase marketplace.
Key Points:
Four stocks are live: Nvidia, Apple, Meta and Alphabet.
The tokens are offered under Regulation S and are not available to US persons or in other restricted jurisdictions.
Alpaca holds the underlying shares in regulated custody. Coinbase says holders have a direct, senior claim on the underlying equity.
Primary minting and redemption are limited to KYC-onboarded institutional partners and Authorized Participants. Once minted, the tokens can transfer without whitelisted wallets.
The tokens trade 24/7. Chainlink's US equity price feeds operate 24/5.
The Defiant reported about $4.5 million minted, $3 million of DEX liquidity and $10.8 million of 24-hour volume late on launch day.
Bitwise launched automated portfolios using Coinbase's tokenized stocks through Glider the following day. Users keep the individual assets in self-custody while Glider handles rebalancing.
The Tokenized Take
Nvidia stops trading on Friday. NVDAc, Coinbase's tokenized Nvidia share, does not.
Rob Hadick put the mechanism on Ep. 94: “With today's wrappers you still cannot buy the underlying off-hours, so someone has to hold weekend risk.”
Coinbase widens who is exposed to it. Its tokens can move between wallets without a secondary-market whitelist, so any lending market can take them.
Robinhood had already taken stock tokens into DeFi, but under a different legal structure - its tokens are debt securities. Coinbase says its holders have a direct claim on shares held in regulated custody. The weekend pricing problem is similar, but the legal structure is different.
That matters once the token becomes collateral.
Imagine Coinbase's Nvidia token falls sharply on Saturday, but the lending protocol is still using Friday's Nvidia price. The loan can look healthy even when the collateral has already lost value. When the oracle updates, the protocol may discover the position too late to liquidate without taking a loss.
The protocol can use Friday's price, pause liquidations until markets reopen, or reach for another weekend price source. Each choice moves the risk rather than removing it. Chainlink publishes market-status and staleness data, so venues can tell when the reference market is shut. What they do with that signal is a risk-policy decision.
Base points to Aave, Morpho and Euler as protocols that have announced B20 support, with tokenized Nvidia as lending collateral the obvious first use. None of that is running at scale yet.
Bitwise added another layer within a day. Automated portfolios do not create the oracle problem, but they add products depending on these assets before it is solved.
The next step is likely to be specific weekend rules for tokenized-stock collateral. That could mean lower LTVs, larger haircuts, stricter stale-price limits or pausing liquidations while the underlying market is closed.
Coinbase has made the equity more programmable. The harder question is whether a seven-day financial product can safely depend on a five-day market.
🚀 Standard Chartered Moves Across Stablecoins, Deposits and Digital Debt
Standard Chartered announced three tokenisation milestones in six days. The one worth reading twice is the line about settling its own treasury flows on a stablecoin issued by a subsidiary it majority-owns.
On 19 August Standard Chartered and HSBC used Swift’s blockchain ledger to match and net tokenised-deposit obligations. A day later it issued $200 million of its own debt natively on Euroclear's digital infrastructure. Then on 24 August it became the first bank distributor of HKDAP, one of Hong Kong's first two regulated HKD stablecoins.
The rails stay separate. The client, the compliance framework and the treasury relationship are what run across all three.
Key Points:
19 August, Swift: Standard Chartered and HSBC completed the first live interbank use of Swift’s blockchain ledger. Swift matched and netted the tokenised-deposit obligations, while final settlement remained on the banks’ existing systems. The ledger opened for initial use in July with 17 banks preparing transactions.
20 August, Euroclear: Standard Chartered issued $200 million of three-year floating-rate digitally native notes through Euroclear's D-FMI. Per Standard Chartered, it is the first G-SIB and first UK issuer on the platform. The issuance sits inside the bank's established funding programme.
24 August, HKDAP: SCBHK became HKDAP's first bank distributor, per Standard Chartered. The Ethereum-based HKD stablecoin is issued by Anchorpoint Financial, a joint venture of SCBHK, HKT and Animoca Brands, and went live in phased access on 12 August. Anchorpoint and HSBC won Hong Kong's first two stablecoin licences in April from 36 applicants.
The Tokenized Take:
HKDAP's first serious user is likely to be Standard Chartered itself.
Buried in the 24 August announcement is a plan to settle intragroup treasury and liquidity flows in HKDAP, and it does not depend on an external client adopting anything. The tokenised-fund use case needs asset managers and investors to show up. Intragroup settlement is a decision Standard Chartered makes on its own.
It also puts the current scale into perspective. Just 522,000 HKDAP (~US $67,000) were in circulation as of 19 August, per Anchorpoint. Standard Chartered is preparing to use the rail internally before there is meaningful external volume.
Standard Chartered is building a servicing business around HKDAP.
Anchorpoint issues the stablecoin, but Standard Chartered sits across much of what happens around it. SCBHK is Anchorpoint’s majority owner and first bank distributor. Standard Chartered provides banking and reserve-management services, SCBHK is the intended custodian for non-digital reserves, and Standard Chartered Trustee holds those reserves in trust for tokenholders.
That is a different business from distributing a third-party stablecoin. Standard Chartered can provide the banking, custody and distribution services around HKDAP as usage grows. The public documents do not disclose how those fees or the reserve income are divided within the group.
There is also concentration inside the group. The reserves are legally segregated from Anchorpoint, but the trustee is a Standard Chartered entity and the issuer is a majority-owned subsidiary. That structure is licensed by the HKMA, though institutional risk teams will still treat the group relationships as part of their counterparty assessment.
HSBC and Standard Chartered are testing two different bank models.
In April we said banks would not have to choose between stablecoins and tokenised deposits. What's clearer now is that there's more than one way to avoid choosing.
HSBC holds its stablecoin licence directly and now runs Tokenised Deposit Service (TDS) across six markets and seven currencies. Standard Chartered surrounds a majority-owned licensed issuer with banking infrastructure and distribution. HSBC is more integrated at the issuance node; Standard Chartered has built a deeper servicing chain around a separate issuer.
Whichever structure gets copied by the next wave of banks will tell us something about where they think the margin sits.
Swift and Euroclear are the same instinct in different venues. Standard Chartered is putting its deposits and its own funding onto infrastructure other people run, while owning the servicing layer on the one it part-owns.
The commercial opportunity sits around the movement between different forms of money and assets. Standard Chartered can keep the client, liquidity, custody, compliance and treasury relationship even as the instrument changes.
Two things would confirm this. Real intragroup treasury volume, and named asset managers settling tokenised funds in HKDAP in Q4.
If those arrive, the interesting part of HKDAP will not be who minted the coin. It will be how much banking business Standard Chartered managed to build around it.
🚀 39 State Banking Associations Want to Buy Blockchain Together
Thirty-nine state banking associations have formed BankChain Alliance to develop a shared banking network. The Alliance is selecting a technology partner, with a reporting that the first stage of its RFP is already complete.
The network is targeted for 2027, with no vendor selected or bank publicly committed to using it yet.
Key Points:
BankChain says its associations represent 3,283 banks with $21.8 trillion in assets, based on FDIC data as of March 31, 2026. Its own website says those banks are not individually committed to the network unless separately indicated.
The Alliance has completed phase one of its technology RFP, with compliance weighted most heavily. It is now evaluating security and contractual responsibilities, and wants an ownership stake in the eventual technology partner.
The proposed network would support tokenized deposits, stablecoins, smart payments and automated settlement, with interoperability to other networks. Launch is targeted for 2027, with no month disclosed.
Cari, a bank-led tokenized deposit network, is further ahead operationally. 30+ banks had joined, with another 40 in discussions. It has six design partner banks and announced a six-bank pilot in July. Cari also joined the ABA’s Premier Partner Network that month, while SouthState says its correspondent platform serves more than 1,300 financial institutions.
The Tokenized Take:
Before BankChain builds a chain, it is organising a purchase.
That distinction matters. Smaller banks rarely have the economics to build new settlement infrastructure themselves, and individually they have limited leverage over major technology vendors. BankChain gives them a way to aggregate demand, negotiate once and potentially own part of the infrastructure they end up using.
Cari shows why access alone is not BankChain’s differentiator. It already has much of the distribution BankChain is assembling - banks, technology partners, ABA access and SouthState's correspondent network. A community bank looking for tokenized-deposit infrastructure does not necessarily need to wait until 2027.
BankChain's answer is ownership. Banks wouldn’t just connect to the infrastructure. They would have equity in the provider and a vote over governance, products and pricing.
That also puts the 3,283 banks and $21.8 trillion figure in perspective. It is a measure of potential purchasing power, not adoption. BankChain still has to convert association membership into banks willing to use and own the network.
But the broader direction is becoming harder to ignore. The Clearing House (TCH) is pooling infrastructure among the largest banks, Cari is doing the same further down the market, and Swift is working on interoperability between bank-led systems.
For most banks, the decision that matters may be which shared networks they buy into, and whether ownership comes with the connection.
🏛️ India Reportedly Plans Tokenized Corporate Bond Pilot With Wholesale CBDC
Tokenized bond issuance is no longer novel. The question now is what form of money settles these assets and what that choice enables. Reuters reports that India plans to test a tokenized corporate bond in September, with wholesale digital rupees settling the cash leg.
SEBI has confirmed that a corporate bond tokenization pilot is being developed. When Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey announced it in May, he said that SEBI and the exchanges were ready to launch once the RBI cleared it. Neither SEBI nor RBI has confirmed the September date, REC as issuer or the settlement design Reuters describes.
Key Points:
The reported September issue: Reuters, citing three people with direct knowledge of the plans, says state-owned REC would issue less than ₹5 billion ($57 million) of tokenized corporate bonds to selected investors. The bonds would have a three-month lock-in, with secondary trading targeted for December.
Two wallets: Investors would use a bank-provided e₹-W wallet for the cash leg and a new DEMAT 2.0 securities wallet being developed by India's depositories. Subsequent trades would require both counterparties to have compatible CBDC and securities wallets.
India has already tokenized an instrument against e₹-W: RBI's wholesale CBDC now covers government securities settlement, call-money settlement and tokenized issuance and settlement of Certificates of Deposit. RBI's February 2026 FAQ lists 16 wholesale participants, including banks and non-banks. RBI also operates a CBDC and Asset Tokenisation Sandbox for non-live testing.
The underlying bond market is large but fragmented: India has roughly 33,000 outstanding corporate bond instruments across around 7,200 issuers, yet only 400 to 500 trade on a typical day. Outstanding corporate bonds passed ₹60 trillion by July 2026. SEBI is separately pursuing market-making and consolidation into fewer benchmark ISINs.
The Tokenized Take:
The reported REC issue would take India's existing tokenization work into corporate credit and depository infrastructure.
Three things will determine whether this becomes useful market infrastructure.
1. Access to the cash leg still matters.
Central-bank money removes private issuer and redemption risk from the cash leg. But the design still depends on who can access e₹-W. Non-banks already participate in RBI's wholesale pilot, so bank provision is not absolute. What nobody has described is whether buy-side institutions such as mutual funds, insurers and pension funds could hold e₹-W directly for this pilot, or how they would fund and drain those wallets.
Swiss banks in the SNB's Helvetia pilot tokenized sight deposits into wholesale CBDC and convert them back through the Swiss RTGS system, with SDX and RTGS operating hours aligned to make it work. India has not yet described equivalent mechanics to do so.
2. Faster settlement does not change buy-and-hold behaviour.
Pandey has argued that tokenisation could improve liquidity. But settlement speed is only one part of the problem. Much of India's corporate bond market is held by institutions matching long-term liabilities, so faster DvP does not give an insurer or pension fund a reason to sell.
SEBI's own whole-time member has said the pilot is not meant to create a separate trading market, while the regulator is also pushing market-making and benchmark ISIN consolidation. That shows SEBI sees liquidity as a market-structure problem, not just a settlement problem.
3. Financing is the next test.
Switzerland has already tested repo transactions using tokenised assets and wholesale CBDC, although entirely in test environments. And its own write-up named collateral management, market fragmentation and communication standards as unresolved challenges.
The Eurosystem has gone further in policy, allowing certain DLT-based securities to qualify as central-bank collateral since March 2026, provided they remain reachable through existing CSD and T2S infrastructure.
Nothing disclosed so far says whether an Indian tokenized corporate bond could be repo'd, pledged to RBI or used as collateral. Without a financing path, it remains a bond that settles differently rather than an asset with new balance-sheet utility.
The December number worth watching isn't the issue size. It's how many secondary trades clear between counterparties that had no hand in the primary.
📰 Some More News:
🏦 Tokenization, Stablecoins & Finance
Revolut Starts EURR Rollout With Bridge as Regulated Issuer (Read more here)
South Korea trade giant POSCO brings trade receivables to Avalanche in latest tokenization move (Read more here)
World Liberty Financial launches USD1 natively on Canton Network (Read more here)
OpenPayd and Circle Settle Cross-Border Fiat Payments Near-Instantly (Read more here)
Custody Is the New Compliance: What Institutional-Grade RWA Infrastructure Really Requires in 2026 (Read more here)
Arcus launches tokenized perp positions on Robinhood Chain (Read more here)
Korean bank taps Ripple for payments, Pakistan opens crypto licensing: Asia Express (Read more here)
Arbitrum Activates Elara With Optional Compliance Filters for Dedicated Chains (Read more here)
Circle Targets Sept. 16 for Arc Public Mainnet Launch (Read more here)
LayerZero Unveils ATLAS Exchange Engine (Read more here)
Blockchain Association backs Treasury’s proposed GENIUS Act rules for stablecoin issuers (Read more here)
🤑 Funding and M&A
Stablecoin platform Fasset hits $1bn valuation (Read more here)
Crypto custody firm Copper has potential buyers. But offers are way below its $500 million asking price (Read more here)
Gemini plans to distribute crypto prediction markets through Apex brokerages (Read more here)
💼 Government & Policy
Treasury Unveils Post-Quantum Readiness Task Force (Read more here)
Pakistan Sets September 5 Deadline for Crypto Firms to Register (Read more here)
Thailand moves closer to Bitcoin, Ether ETFs with draft rules (Read more here)
Crypto advocacy groups oppose Illinois digital asset tax in court (Read more here)
Stand With Crypto ramps up midterm push with 32 House endorsements (Read more here)
CLARITY Act 60-Vote Hurdle Puts Crypto Rules in Focus Days After White House Meeting (Read more here)
Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!
Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!
Disclaimers
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business or legal advice. These thoughts & opinions and do not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity or sponsor. Any companies or projects mentioned are for illustrative purposes unless specified.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used in any public or private domain without the express permission of the author.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used for any commercial activity, for example - research report, consultancy activity, or paywalled article without the express permission of the author.
Please note, the services and products advertised by our sponsors (by use of terminology such as but not limited to; supported by, sponsored by, Made Possible by or brought to you by) in this newsletter could carry inherent risks and should not be regarded as completely safe or risk-free. Third-party entities provide these services and products, and we do not control, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, efficacy, or safety of their offerings.
It's crucial to provide our readers with clear information regarding the inherent nature of services and products that might be covered in this newsletter, including those advertised by our sponsors from time to time. When you buy cryptoassets (including NFTs) your capital is at risk. Risks associated with cryptoassets include price volatility, loss of capital (the value of your cryptoassets could drop to zero), complexity, lack of regulation and lack of protection. Most service providers operating in the cryptoasset industry do not currently operate in a regulated industry. Therefore, please be aware that when you buy cryptoassets, you are not protected under financial compensation schemes and protections typically afforded to investors when dealing with regulated and authorised entities to operate as financial services firm.
