If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!
Introduction
Welcome to the Tokenized newsletter, brought to you by the creators of the Tokenized Podcast. Written by Simon Taylor of Fintech Brainfood and Shwetabh Sameer of Molten Ventures.
We are the newsletter for institutions that need help preparing for a Tokenized future.
We run through the headlines every week, what it means for you and a market readout. Always with an institutional, business-focused perspective.
Join us every week as we meet your Tokenization needs.
In This Week's Edition:
💬 Simon’s Market Readout: Visa, Zodia Custody, and Stripe are now Tempo validators - good luck arguing blockchain can't handle payments-grade uptime now.
📰 Stories You Can't Miss: The stablecoin yield war reaches Congress with no ABA model in sight, Hong Kong licenses its banknote printers to mint digital money, and Deutsche Börse's $200M Kraken stake completes the exchange operator land grab.
This newsletter is sponsored by M0!
Make your own money. m0.org.
Stablecoins are becoming global financial infrastructure.
Brands partner to issue their own stablecoins with regulated issuers.
Stablecoin issuers want to issue for the most valuable brands.
Both need robust tech.
M0 is the only platform where issuers and brands get together to build stablecoins.
Make your own money. m0.org.
Simon’s Market Readout 💬
A pixelated Simon gives you his market readout for the week.
Editor's Note: Simon Taylor leads Market Development at Tempo. The below is based on Simon's notes and reflects his perspective.
Visa, Zodia Custody (in partnership with Standard Chartered), and Stripe have joined Tempo as validators. What these three have in common matters more than who they are individually: they all operate payments infrastructure at scale, in production, with the kind of reliability and uptime that gets stress-tested during peak demand — and they pass every time.
That's the job of payments infrastructure. When you tap your card to buy something, it just works. You never think about who's behind it. You never think they exist. That invisibility is the product.
For too long, blockchains and payments have had a UX problem, a performance problem, and — more than anything — a reliability problem. Can I actually count on this thing when it matters? Having companies that have answered that question at global scale now validating the network changes the conversation. The reliability problem can finally be put to bed.
As somebody who's had a front-row seat to everything happening at Tempo, what excites me most is the learning that comes next. Institutions, startups, banks, non-banks — everybody in between — are now building on the platform. And the real question we're all working toward is: what does it actually take to build internet-scale payments infrastructure for the next century?
Nobody has the full answer yet. There's a whole bunch of things that haven't been battle-tested at this kind of pace and throughput. Having partners to learn with — partners who've operated through the most demanding periods in payments — is how you find out.
Stories You Can't Miss 📰
🏛️ The Yield War Reaches Inflection Point: Tillis Draft, ABA Counterattack, and JPMorgan's Earnings Call Converge
Three things happened within five days of the Senate returning from recess: 1) Senator Tillis is releasing his revised CLARITY Act draft with Alsobrooks this week, 2) the American Bankers Association (ABA) publicly attacked the White House's CEA yield study as "asking the wrong question," and 3) JPMorgan's CFO warned on the bank's Q1 earnings call that stablecoin yield risks creating "a giant arbitrage backdoor."
Banking Committee markup is targeted for late April. Senator Moreno has said that missing May kills the bill until after midterms. This is the most consequential two-week stretch in U.S. stablecoin legislative history.
Key Points:
The CEA paper still remains unchallenged on the math. Banning stablecoin yield increases bank lending by $2.1 billion (0.02% of total loans) at a consumer welfare cost of $800 million per year. Cost-benefit ratio: 6.6-to-1 against the ban. Even under every worst-case assumption stacked simultaneously, the model produces $531 billion - conditions the CEA calls "independently implausible."
The ABA fired back the CEA's framing, not a model. On April 13, ABA economists argued the CEA studied "the wrong question" and cited $4.4–$8.7 billion in potential lending reduction for Iowa alone. The roughly 900-word response contains no formal model, no calibrated parameters, and no welfare calculation.
JPMorgan's CFO framed stablecoin yield as regulatory arbitrage on the Q1 earnings call. Jeremy Barnum warned against creating "a giant arbitrage backdoor for the prohibition on the payment of interest." In the same answer, he highlighted Kinexys - the bank's deposit token infrastructure processing $5 billion daily - as core to JPMorgan's payments modernization.
The Tillis-Alsobrooks draft bans passive yield but permits "activity-based rewards." Passive interest from holding stablecoins is out. Rewards tied to transactions, liquidity provision, or governance are in. Armstrong endorsed the bill on April 9-10 after blocking it twice this year. Stripe's position on the revised text remains unclear.
The bill still has to survive markup. Polymarket has CLARITY Act passage in 2026 at 59%, down from a February peak of 82%. The decline reflects months of yield stalemate and repeated markup delays - not Armstrong's reversal, which came after the drop. The markup itself hasn't been scheduled yet.
The Tokenized Take:
The ABA didn't publish a model. That matters because any rigorous framework they build runs into the same data wall the CEA hit: only 12% of stablecoin reserves sit in cash (Circle publishes this quarterly - the rest is in T-bills and repos), the CEA calculates $1.1 trillion in excess bank liquidity above regulatory minimums, and the Fed maintains an ample-reserves regime. Those three parameters cap the lending effect at single-digit billions under any defensible calibration. Until the ABA shows the math behind them, their Iowa projections remain unanchored.
The Iowa figure of $4.4-$8.7 billion in lost lending for a single state - is built to alarm a senator, and it does. But it only tracks one side of the ledger. It calculates what happens to the bank that loses deposits to stablecoins. What it doesn't calculate is what happens when the stablecoin issuer buys a T-bill and the dealer deposits the proceeds at another bank. The money doesn't leave the banking system. It moves within it. The CEA paper was built specifically to close that gap - tracking both sides. The ABA's numbers only track one.
What the banking lobby is ultimately defending isn't lending capacity - it's deposit pricing power. If stablecoins offer competitive yield, banks have to raise deposit rates to retain customers. That compresses net interest margins. That's a profitability problem for banks, not a credit availability problem for the economy. The community bank framing is politically potent but economically thin - the CEA finds community banks would gain $500 million from a yield ban. That's 0.026% of community bank lending.
JPMorgan's earnings call makes the incumbent strategy explicit: absorb the technology, preserve the regulatory moat. Barnum called Kinexys innovation "exciting" and stablecoin yield "regulatory arbitrage" - in the same answer to the same analyst. The bank wants the blockchain rails without the deposit competition. This means: if stablecoins must meet every requirement banks meet, only banks can practically issue them.
There's also an international dimension that cuts directly against the ABA's position - and it's one the White House is already acting on. The CEA paper notes that over 80% of stablecoin transactions occur outside the United States, and stablecoin issuers already hold more T-bills than Saudi Arabia. A passive yield ban that suppresses adoption also suppresses foreign demand for U.S. Treasuries - which directly undermines the dollar dominance rationale the White House is publicly optimizing for. Secretary Bessent framed the CLARITY Act as a national security priority in his Wall Street Journal op-ed the same week. Banning yield cuts against that objective.
The Tillis-Alsobrooks compromise - passive yield banned, activity-based rewards permitted - is the emerging political resolution. Banks preserve the savings layer. Stablecoins get the payments layer. Armstrong's endorsement signals Coinbase can work within that structure, at least for now. But the markup hasn't happened, Stripe's position is unresolved, and the ABA is clearly trying to run the clock past May.
Even if banks secure the passive yield prohibition, the activity-based rewards carve-out plants something they haven't fully gamed out. Once stablecoins are established as payment instruments with transaction-linked incentives, the infrastructure is in place - wallets open, rails built, user behavior formed. And there's now a White House study on the books saying the lending threat rounds to zero. The next Congress that revisits passive yield starts from a fundamentally different position than this one.
If the Tillis-Alsobrooks text holds, banks get the yield ban they wanted. The price is conceding the payments layer to stablecoins permanently. History suggests the side that controls the rails eventually controls the economics. The savings layer is next - it's just a matter of which Congress reopens the door.
🏛️ The Banks That Print Hong Kong's Cash Can Now Mint Its Digital Version - And HSBC Is Building Both Sides of the Architecture
The institutions authorized to print physical Hong Kong dollar banknotes (a system dating to 1846) are now authorized to issue digital ones. The HKMA didn't arrive at that outcome by accident.
On April 10, the HKMA awarded its inaugural stablecoin issuer licenses to two entities from a pool of 36 applicants: HSBC and Anchorpoint Financial, a joint venture between Standard Chartered, Animoca Brands, and Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT). Three days later, HSBC disclosed it had completed a tokenized deposit pilot on the Canton Network. Put those two announcements side by side, and the strategic picture comes into focus.
We covered this licensing framework in September 2025 when BOCHK applied and the 36-applicant pool took shape, and again in October when Beijing intervened to kill Ant Group and JD.com's stablecoin ambitions over "who controls the ultimate right of coinage." This week is the resolution of that arc.
Key Points:
The HKMA selected its two note-issuing banks first - HSBC and Standard Chartered - anchoring digital money issuance in existing monetary infrastructure rather than creating a parallel system. BOCHK, the third note-issuing bank and the story we led with in September 2025, didn't make the first batch.
HSBC plans PayMe integration (~3.3 million users) in H2 2026. Anchorpoint will launch its HKDAP stablecoin in Q2 2026. Two different go-to-market strategies under the same license class.
Separately, HSBC completed a pilot on the Canton Network - a public blockchain for regulated institutions with configurable privacy - simulating the issuance, transfer, and atomic settlement of its Tokenised Deposit Service (TDS) against other digital assets.
First time TDS was deployed outside HSBC's own ledger. The pilot demonstrated delivery-versus-payment settlement across cash and asset legs, with TDS supporting USD, GBP, EUR, HKD, and SGD. Further, HSBC expanded TDS to the United States - making it live across five institutional finance jurisdictions: Hong Kong, Singapore, Luxembourg, the UK, and the US.
The Tokenized Take:
HSBC is now the only bank in the world simultaneously licensed to issue regulated stablecoins and piloting tokenized deposit interoperability on an institutional settlement network. That dual positioning means it can offer clients whichever form of digital money fits the use case - stablecoins for retail payments through PayMe, tokenized deposits for institutional settlement through Canton - without picking a lane. For corporate treasurers operating across Asia, that optionality is the point.
Then there's BOCHK. The $430 billion state-backed institution whose application we flagged as "potentially incredibly significant" last September was passed over. Given Beijing's October intervention over monetary sovereignty, the omission likely isn't accidental. There's a layer beneath that: under Hong Kong's Linked Exchange Rate System, an HKD stablecoin is functionally a USD-derivative instrument. A state-backed Chinese bank issuing that at scale would compound Beijing's monetary sovereignty concerns. The HKMA threaded the needle - license the international banks first, defer the geopolitically sensitive applicant.
There's a quieter policy signal underneath: the HKMA's 11-group retail CBDC pilot concluded in October 2025 and found the consumer case was weak. This indicates why Hong Kong would have chosen regulated bank-issued stablecoins over direct central bank issuance - the opposite of Beijing's e-CNY approach.
The Anchorpoint consortium structure reveals something about the HKMA's regulatory philosophy. A crypto-native firm - Animoca Brands - is part of a licensed stablecoin issuer. The HKMA is effectively saying: we'll let non-traditional players into the issuance structure, as long as a note-issuing bank is the anchor. Permissive on who participates, strict on who underwrites the trust. That's a distinctly different posture from jurisdictions that would keep crypto-native firms away from money issuance entirely.
The competitive dynamics between HSBC and Anchorpoint will be worth watching. PayMe gives HSBC a massive retail distribution advantage out of the gate. Anchorpoint has explicitly positioned HKDAP as the settlement currency for onchain bonds, funds, and tokenized real-world assets - not just payments. Combined with Animoca's crypto-native reach and HKT's telecom distribution, they're targeting the cash leg of Asia's tokenized securities market, not competing with PayMe for P2P transfers. The institutional question is whether these two HKD stablecoins become interchangeable - the way Hong Kong's physical banknotes are today, regardless of issuing bank - or whether they fragment the market into separate ecosystems. Under the current note-issuing system, an HSBC hundred-dollar bill and a Standard Chartered hundred-dollar bill are identical in value and acceptance. Whether the same holds for their digital equivalents will depend on infrastructure decisions being made right now.
On the Canton pilot: in September 2025, HSBC completed its first TDS cross-border transaction for Ant International on its own ledger. Last week, Transcend demonstrated collateral movement on Canton. This pilot connects those threads - HSBC testing whether its deposit tokens can settle atomically against third-party digital assets on shared infrastructure. It's also a strategic vote for the shared-network model over JPMorgan's approach of building proprietary rails (Kinexys) and inviting others in. Canton already hosts Goldman Sachs and BNY's tokenized money market funds and Circle's xReserve infrastructure, with reports that JPMorgan plans to bring JPM Coin onto the network. If it consolidates as the institutional settlement layer, that has real implications for who captures infrastructure value in the tokenization stack.
The deposit token vs. stablecoin debate assumed banks would have to pick a lane. HSBC is proving they don't have to, by owning both layers in Asia's most advanced regulatory jurisdiction for digital money. The remaining question is whether BOCHK appears in the next licensing batch - and whether Beijing's "right of coinage" concerns have been resolved, or merely deferred.
🚀 Deutsche Börse Takes $200M Stake in Kraken - And the Exchange Operator Land Grab Goes Transatlantic
Europe's largest exchange operator just bought 1.5% of Kraken's parent company Payward for $200 million, valuing the crypto exchange at $13.3 billion. The investment is a secondary share purchase - existing shares, not new issuance - expected to close by June, subject to regulatory approval.
A month ago, we noted that ICE chose OKX and Nasdaq chose Kraken as tokenized-equities distribution partners. Now the map has a third pin. Every major Western exchange operator has chosen a crypto partner and is locking in the relationship with capital:
ICE (NYSE): OKX at $25 billion
Nasdaq: Kraken (partnership, no equity - yet)
Deutsche Börse: Kraken at $13.3 billion
Traditional exchange operators aren't building crypto infrastructure. They're buying into it.
Key Points:
This isn't a cold investment. Deutsche Börse and Kraken announced a strategic partnership in December 2025 covering trading, custody, settlement, collateral management, and tokenized assets. By February, xStocks had launched on Deutsche Börse’s tokenized-securities rails. The $200 million came after commercial integration. The partnership was the audition; this is the contract.
The partnership spans almost every layer of the capital markets stack. Kraken integrates with 360T, one of the world's largest FX trading venues, for bank-grade FX liquidity. Eurex-listed derivatives are planned for Kraken's platform. And Clearstream, Deutsche Börse's custody arm holding roughly $20 trillion in traditional assets, will work toward distributing tokenized securities to Kraken's client base.
The 33% valuation discount reflects timing, not weakness. Kraken raised $800 million at a $20 billion valuation in November 2025 and confidentially filed for a U.S. IPO - since shelved. With the listing paused, existing shareholders looking for liquidity are selling at a discount. For a strategic buyer like Deutsche Börse, that's a cheaper entry into a relationship they've already validated commercially.
Payward reported $2.2 billion in adjusted revenue for 2025, up 33% year-over-year, with 53% now coming from non-trading sources - custody, payments, yield, financing. That revenue split matters: Kraken is materially less dependent on trading cycles than its crypto exchange peers.
The Tokenized Take:
The surface read is that traditional exchanges are buying into crypto rather than building. True, but the more fascinating question is why Kraken keeps winning these partnerships.
Over the past 18 months, Kraken assembled something none of its crypto-native competitors can match. NinjaTrader ($1.5 billion acquisition in May’25) gave them traditional futures distribution. Backed Finance (announced Dec’25) gave them xStocks - $25 billion in tokenized equity volume, 85,000+ holders. In March, Kraken Financial received a Federal Reserve master account, gaining direct Fedwire access (limited - no interest on reserves, no emergency lending, no FedNow). Add MiCA and EMI licenses for Europe and the UK, Citadel's $200 million investment, and the Nasdaq partnership for tokenized stock distribution.
None of it is unique in isolation. Combined under one counterparty, it gives Deutsche Börse and Nasdaq a single integration point across crypto and traditional capital markets across the U.S. and Europe.
The Clearstream angle deserves more attention than it's getting. Deutsche Börse's plan to tokenize securities held in Clearstream custody and distribute them through Kraken creates a direct pipe from Europe's largest securities custodian to crypto-native distribution. If that integration works, a retail investor on Kraken could hold a tokenized German government bond with Clearstream settlement guarantees. The gap between institutional and retail access to capital markets products starts to shrink.
The competitive pressure now falls on whoever's left. Euronext has invested in tokenization tooling and listed crypto ETPs. LSEG built a blockchain platform for private funds. HKEX launched a digital asset index. None of them have publicly reported an equity stake in a crypto exchange or locked in a distribution partner. The question is now straightforward: who is yours? ICE chose OKX. Nasdaq and Deutsche Börse both chose Kraken. The credentialed crypto exchanges are getting locked up, and every quarter that passes, the remaining options get more expensive or less proven.
One thing worth watching: Kraken now has deep partnerships with both Nasdaq and Deutsche Börse - two exchange operators that compete directly for listing and trading share. Managing that dual relationship without conflicts, especially around tokenized equity distribution where both partners have overlapping ambitions, will test Kraken's ability to stay a neutral infrastructure partner. That may prove harder than any of the technology.
📰 Some More News:
🏦 Tokenization, Stablecoins & Finance
SIX Group stock exchanges feeding equities market data to Chainlink (Read more here)
Ripple teams with Kyobo Life Insurance on South Korea tokenized bond settlement (Read more here)
Ondo seeks SEC clearance for tokenized equities model on Ethereum (Read more here)
Broadridge rolls out crypto and tokenized asset platform for Canadian wealth managers (Read more here)
Societe Generale-FORGE brings MiCA-compliant USDCV stablecoin to MetaMask via Consensys partnership (Read more here)
Fireblocks launches Earn feature for institutions to route stablecoin balances into Aave and Morpho lending (Read more here)
Tether launches self-custodial wallet supporting USDT, USAT, Bitcoin and tokenized gold (Read more here)
Circle exploring token launch and proof-of-stake shift for Arc Network (Read more here)
Morpho unveils Morpho Midnight, a fixed-rate, fixed-term lending protocol (Read more here)
Goldman Sachs files for Bitcoin Premium Income ETF using options-based yield strategy (Read more here)
Y Combinator settles first all-stablecoin funding round in USDC on Solana ($500K to Totalis) (Read more here)
Brix raises $5.5M to tokenize emerging market assets, plans Turkish lira-backed token on MegaETH (Read more here)
🤑 Funding and M&A
eToro to acquire crypto wallet Zengo in ~$70M deal, adding self-custody capabilities (Read more here)
AICChain secures $25M from Gulf-Legacy to scale AI-driven RWA infrastructure (Read more here)
OpenGradient raises $9.5 million to advance its verifiable AI computing network (Read more here)
Nava raises $8.3 million in seed funding to keep AI financial agents from going off the rails (Read more here)
Paxos Labs raises $12M led by Blockchain Capital for Amplify yield, lending and stablecoin issuance platform (Read more here)
Switzerland's Crypto Valley funding rose 37% in 2025 to $728M; TON's $400M round led the pack (Read more here)
Kraken confirms confidential IPO filing; signals listing still in play despite earlier reports of pause (Read more here)
💼 Government & Policy
FCA consults on guidance for UK's future crypto regime, with regulation effective from October 2027 (Read more here)
EU adviser says "MiCA 2" is likely as crypto market matures beyond original framework (Read more here)
ECB backs ESMA-led crypto supervision in the EU, signaling tighter MiCA enforcement (Read more here)
Pakistan lifts seven-year ban, allowing banks to service licensed crypto providers (Read more here)
Bank of Korea nominee backs central bank-led digital currency, sees limited role for stablecoins (Read more here)
Fed Chair nominee Kevin Warsh discloses crypto portfolio including Compound, Dapper Labs and prediction market investments (Read more here)
SEC issues staff statement clarifying DeFi interfaces may not need broker-dealer registration (Read more here)
Virginia signs law bringing digital assets under unclaimed property rules with one-year holding period (Read more here)
White House crypto advisor says list of "unsolvable" issues on legislation has shrunk (Read more here)
Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!
Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!
Disclaimers
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business or legal advice. These thoughts & opinions and do not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity or sponsor. Any companies or projects mentioned are for illustrative purposes unless specified.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used in any public or private domain without the express permission of the author.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used for any commercial activity, for example - research report, consultancy activity, or paywalled article without the express permission of the author.
Please note, the services and products advertised by our sponsors (by use of terminology such as but not limited to; supported by, sponsored by, Made Possible by or brought to you by) in this newsletter could carry inherent risks and should not be regarded as completely safe or risk-free. Third-party entities provide these services and products, and we do not control, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, efficacy, or safety of their offerings.
It's crucial to provide our readers with clear information regarding the inherent nature of services and products that might be covered in this newsletter, including those advertised by our sponsors from time to time. When you buy cryptoassets (including NFTs) your capital is at risk. Risks associated with cryptoassets include price volatility, loss of capital (the value of your cryptoassets could drop to zero), complexity, lack of regulation and lack of protection. Most service providers operating in the cryptoasset industry do not currently operate in a regulated industry. Therefore, please be aware that when you buy cryptoassets, you are not protected under financial compensation schemes and protections typically afforded to investors when dealing with regulated and authorised entities to operate as financial services firm.
