If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

Pssst. We also have a podcast… find that here on your favourite podcast player or here on YouTube 🙏

Welcome to the Tokenized newsletter, brought to you by the creators of the Tokenized Podcast. Written by Simon Taylor of Fintech Brainfood and Shwetabh Sameer of Molten Ventures.

We are the newsletter for institutions that need help preparing for a Tokenized future.

We run through the headlines every week, what it means for you and a market readout. Always with an institutional, business-focused perspective. 

Join us every week as we meet your Tokenization needs.

💬 Simon’s Market Readout: The White House CEA published the stablecoin yield numbers the bank lobby didn't want to see. 0.02% lending gain. $800M consumer welfare loss. 6.6-to-1 against. Two weeks before the CLARITY Act markup.

📰 Stories You Can't Miss: Dimon puts blockchain in JPMorgan's competitive threats section alongside Stripe and Revolut. Broadridge extends proxy voting to tokenized equities — the post-trade lifecycle just caught up. And Reg Crypto lands at OIRA as the CLARITY Act targets a late-April markup: the U.S. regulatory stack is assembling in real time.

This newsletter is sponsored by M0!

Stablecoins are becoming global financial infrastructure.

Brands partner to issue their own stablecoins with regulated issuers.

Stablecoin issuers want to issue for the most valuable brands.

Both need robust tech.

M0 is the only platform where issuers and brands get together to build stablecoins.

Make your own money. m0.org.

The White House Council of Economic Advisers just published its stablecoin yield study — the report Senate Banking Republicans have been pressing to see since March.

Its findings are quite different from the bank lobby's position.

At baseline calibration, eliminating stablecoin yield increases bank lending by $2.1 billion. That's a ~0.02% increase against a $12 trillion lending base.

The cost-benefit ratio: 6.6 to 1. Against the ban.

The CEA's own language: the concern is "quantitatively small." The vast majority of stablecoin reserves stay parked inside the banking system anyway — only 12% of reserves are held as bank deposits subject to full-reserve requirements. The other 88% is in T-bills and repos, which recirculate through the system as ordinary deposits. A dollar that moves into stablecoins doesn't vanish from bank balance sheets. It moves from one institution to another.

Even stacking every worst-case assumption — stablecoin market share sextuples, all reserves shift into segregated deposits, and the Federal Reserve abandons its ample-reserves framework — the model produces $531 billion in additional lending. That's a 4.4% increase. And the CEA calls those conditions “independently implausible”.

Deposit flight was the banking industry's ace card. It stalled the CLARITY Act in January. It collapsed the first Banking Committee markup. The ABA rejected a White House compromise over it in March. But the administration's own economists just dismantled the core premise: banning yield costs consumers $800 million a year in welfare for a lending gain that rounds to zero.

The timing matters. Senate returns from recess April 13. Banking Committee markup is targeted for late April. This report lands two weeks before the most important vote in the CLARITY Act's history.

And remember: the GENIUS Act already bans direct issuer yield. The workarounds — Coinbase's USDC Rewards, whitelabel issuance, affiliate arrangements — were “loopholes” for the banks. But the CEA frames closing those channels as a net negative for consumers. The welfare loss comes from depositors losing access to yield, while the borrowing market gains almost nothing on the margin.

This is a significant blow to the bank lobby — from the White House itself.

JPMorgan's CEO has spent years calling Bitcoin a fraud while his bank quietly built one of the most advanced blockchain payment networks in financial services. His 2025 shareholder letter resolves that contradiction - not by endorsing crypto, but by reclassifying blockchain-based competition as a core strategic concern on par with Stripe and Revolut.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

Placing stablecoins and tokenization in the competitive threats section, alongside companies JPMorgan tracks as serious rivals, does something no amount of pilot announcements or conference keynotes could: it gives every bank board in the world institutional cover to treat blockchain as a strategic priority rather than a technology experiment. When the CEO of a ~$186 billion revenue institution tells shareholders that blockchain competitors could "change the fundamental nature" of banking, the permission structure shifts industry wide.

The co-option strategy is clear. "Roll out our own" is not an endorsement of public chains, DeFi, or decentralisation - it's the classic incumbent response: absorb the technology, reject the ideology. JPMorgan's approach remains permissioned and proprietary through Kinexys. But the competitive pressure Dimon identifies is coming from public chain infrastructure. Stablecoins run on chains like Ethereum and Solana. Tokenization platforms like Securitize and Ondo operate on public rails. The competitors he's worried about - Block, Stripe, Revolut - are all building on or integrating with public chains.

And JPMorgan knows this. We covered the Kinexys public launch in our November 12 edition, where JPM Coin went live on Base with institutional clients including B2C2 and Mastercard. Simon's analysis at the time laid out the bridge mechanism: deposit tokens on Base could be swapped for USDC, creating interoperability between JPMorgan's walled garden and the open stablecoin ecosystem. So, while the shareholder letter positions blockchain as something JPMorgan will build internally, the operational reality is that they're already bridging to public infrastructure - Dimon just isn't telling shareholders that part yet.

Now the interesting question: Is JPMorgan Disney launching Disney+, or Blockbuster acknowledging streaming while hoping DVD sales hold? The evidence points towards Disney. Kinexys is processing ~$1.8T annualized, live on a public L2, and this week added Argentine bank Banco CMF to a client roster that already includes Alibaba, Siemens, and Mitsubishi. That's not a pilot - it's a flywheel. The stablecoin competitors Dimon is worried about are winning by leaving the rails open - any wallet, any chain, any counterparty. That's the risk buried in "roll out our own." If JPMorgan tries to own every layer of the stack - settlement, tokenisation, custody, smart contracts - they build a superior product that nobody outside their client base can access. Kinexys wins on trust and regulatory grade. Stablecoins win on reach. The bet Dimon is making is that trust matters more than reach. History says that works - until it doesn't.

One final note: JPMorgan has ~$40 billion in deployable excess capital sitting idle - more than Circle's current public market cap, available as cash, not a fundraise. The resources to execute are not in question.

The strategic vision - open or closed, interoperate or isolate - is.

The company that processes ~80% of global vote data coverage just told the market that tokenized equities aren't a trading experiment - they're permanent fixtures requiring full post-trade lifecycle support. Broadridge's extension of ProxyVote to tokenized holdings fills the most visible gap in the institutional tokenization stack: what happens after settlement? Trading and custody infrastructure has moved fast. Corporate actions, governance, and disclosure delivery had not. Until now.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

Broadridge processes the vast majority of U.S. proxy votes. When that company extends its governance platform to tokenized equities, it's the post-trade lifecycle catching up to the trading layer.

We've spent months covering tokenized equities from the trading and settlement angle. Nasdaq filed to tokenize every stock. NYSE is building a parallel exchange infrastructure for tokenized securities. Galaxy became the first U.S. public company to issue native tokenized equity on Solana. But all of that work left an open question: what happens after the trade? Corporate actions, proxy voting, dividend distributions, disclosure delivery - the operational plumbing that makes equity ownership actually functional. Broadridge just answered it.

As of today, ProxyVote already consolidates voting across registered and beneficial holdings for institutional investors. Now it adds a third lane: tokenized holdings. One dashboard, three ownership structures, unified governance. Votes are recorded on Broadridge’s Avalanche-based L1 and distributed across multiple blockchains - meaning the system is designed for a multi-chain world from day one, not retrofitted later.

Here's where it gets interesting. Traditional proxy voting is, frankly, a reconciliation nightmare. Record date cutoffs miss late transfers. Nominee chains can hide vote attribution. Over-voting is a persistent problem because the number of votes cast sometimes exceeds shares outstanding, requiring expensive manual correction. An onchain audit trail doesn't just preserve those rights - it can make them work better. Immutable vote records, transparent tallying, real-time confirmation that your vote was counted. That's not "tokenization matches TradFi." That’s a structural upgrade, and Galaxy's May 2026 annual meeting will be the first real-world test of that.

The May 2026 vote for Galaxy is a logical one – it’s a crypto-native company with tokenized equity using blockchain governance infrastructure. But the actual test is whether Broadridge can extend this to traditional issuers. When a Fortune 500 company with a contested board election runs its proxy through onchain infrastructure and gets cleaner vote reconciliation than the legacy system, that's the moment the objections become impossible to sustain.

Cross-border proxy voting is where this could add the most value in the future (and where the most friction remains). Consider a European fund voting in a U.S. proxy through three intermediary custodians. Today, confirming that vote was actually counted can take weeks - buried in reconciliation across different record date rules and nominee structures. Onchain attribution compresses that to minutes, with immutable confirmation of which custodian in which jurisdiction submitted which votes, and when. That said, local market governance workflows and nominee networks won't migrate to blockchain overnight. This holds a lot of promise, though not a near-term guarantee.

For institutional operations teams, the signal is: Broadridge is treating tokenized equities as a permanent fixture in its governance stack, not a pilot. If your firm holds tokenized securities (or plans to), the corporate actions infrastructure is no longer a gap. And if you're an issuer evaluating tokenization, the objection that "tokenized shares can't participate in governance" could be effectively dead.

The U.S. just got closer to having both an executive-branch crypto framework and a legislative market structure bill advancing at the same time. SEC Chair Paul Atkins confirmed on April 6 that Regulation Crypto Assets - the formal safe harbor and fundraising rule he previewed in March - has been submitted to OIRA (the White House office that reviews federal rules before they go public), the last step before it hits the Federal Register for public comment. At the same Vanderbilt summit, within hours of Atkins' remarks, Senator Bill Hagerty said he expects Republicans to bring the CLARITY Act into the Senate Banking Committee in the work period beginning April 13 - and believes it could clear committee this month.

We've been tracking this arc since Project Crypto launched in August 2025 through the token taxonomy and safe harbor preview three weeks ago (read our March 18 coverage here). Reg Crypto at OIRA is the mechanism that converts those signals into a proposed rule.

Key Points:

The Tokenized Take:

Here's what actually changed this week: three weeks ago, we had a Chairman expressing intent. Now we have a rule in the federal review pipeline and a senior committee member putting a date on markup - intent became process.

So, what does this mean in practice? The safe harbor's four-year startup exemption means token projects can launch, raise capital, and build toward decentralisation without full SEC registration - provided they meet disclosure requirements. That changes the math for anyone evaluating tokenized equity, DeFi protocol investments, or onchain fundraising. Six months ago, there was no compliance playbook. Now there's a draft.

The convergence timing matters more than either development alone. Reg Crypto gives the SEC administrative flexibility to move fast. The CLARITY Act gives the market statutory certainty that survives a change in administration. If both stay on track, the U.S. would have agency guidance backed by legislation by early 2027 - fast by Washington standards for anything this complex.

The risk is familiar: bipartisan goodwill tends to evaporate the closer you get to midterms. Hagerty's optimism makes sense, but "clearing committee" and "passing the Senate" are very different things. And OIRA can slow-walk reviews if other White House priorities intervene.

But here's what's hard to ignore: Nasdaq and NYSE have tokenized securities platforms in development. Securitize is pursuing its SPAC merger. Coinbase, Circle, and Paxos hold or are pursuing federal charters. The infrastructure is being built on the assumption these rules arrive. After this week, the builders have more reason to keep building - but the legislative calendar still has to cooperate.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers