If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

This week Simon Taylor & Cuy Sheffield are joined by:

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Tokenized here.

📷 Watch on YouTube.

We Cover:

  • Why Revolut’s EURR rollout starts in Denmark, Poland and Portugal

  • How Standard Chartered’s HKDAP tests a stablecoin beyond intrabank tokenized deposits

  • Why LayerZero’s ATLAS still needs netting, liquidity and trading volume

  • What Fasset, Axiom and Synapse reveal about the falling cost of launching financial products

  • When QuickBooks-style platforms could bring stablecoin accounts into embedded finance

Revolut Wants to Keep Money in the Playground

Revolut began a phased rollout of EURR on Ethereum, then completed the removal of USDT from its retail offering across the EEA and Switzerland on August 31. The two tokens serve different currencies, but the timing captures Revolut’s shift toward stablecoins that fit its European regulatory perimeter. Stripe-owned Bridge issues EURR, which is available to eligible customers in Denmark, Poland and Portugal. The company reports more than 80 million customers and describes EURR as the first step in a plan to introduce stablecoins linked to other currencies.

Cuy Sheffield saw EURR as an onchain extension of the multicurrency account Revolut helped popularize. Instead of switching among euros, pounds and dollars inside a conventional account, customers could eventually hold and exchange stablecoins in each currency around the clock. Simon Taylor connected that thesis to the launch geography. Denmark and Poland sit outside the eurozone, and he saw a use case among expats and cross-border customers who lack domestic access to euro-denominated SEPA payments. For those users, a 24/7 euro balance provides something their local-currency account does not.

One condition determines whether the model works. Customers need reasons to retain the stablecoin after the first conversion or payment, and MiCA rules out yield as one of them. Hannah Arnold noted the token comes with no yield and no rewards, so retention has to come from what customers can do with the balance.

“The stablecoin part is interesting when it stays in stablecoin... Where Revolut maybe has the power here, as a large enough platform across enough countries to say, ‘We’ll push stablecoins and we’ll push multicurrencies across many countries,’ is they may be able to create that playground across many countries, many currencies, to keep the money in the playground.”

Hannah Arnold

Hannah’s “playground” includes the next payment, FX conversion, transfer or onchain investment. Revolut controls that product environment and the customer relationship, while Bridge handles issuance and the related reserve obligations. If EURR becomes a reusable balance rather than a temporary bridge between fiat and crypto, Revolut can turn its multicurrency account into an onchain distribution layer.

Standard Chartered Makes Hong Kong the Test of Two Models

Standard Chartered Bank Hong Kong has become the first bank distributor of HKDAP, a regulated Hong Kong dollar stablecoin issued by its subsidiary Anchorpoint Financial. Standard Chartered is Anchorpoint’s largest shareholder, while Standard Chartered Trustee holds the reserve assets. HKDAP is live on Ethereum in a controlled beta for institutions and professional investors. Anchorpoint reported 522,000 HKDAP in circulation as of August 19, equivalent to roughly US$67,000.

The bank plans tokenized money-market-fund subscriptions and settlement with asset managers in Q4 2026 and says it intends to adopt intragroup settlement across its network in the near term.

The rollout gave the group two questions to work through. The first was how a bank moves from experimentation to a product clients can use. Cuy focused on Standard Chartered starting with its own settlement activity, which lets the bank learn what it needs across custody, permissions, reconciliation and liquidity. Hannah saw the same move as a change from asking whether stablecoins belong inside a bank to working out how they fit into its operations.

“Every year that goes by that a bank hasn’t gotten into this, it’s going to be harder for them to catch up.”

Cuy Sheffield

Simon then widened the discussion to market design. SWIFT’s ledger coordinates tokenized deposits issued by separate banks, while Hong Kong and Singapore are testing stablecoins that can circulate beyond one institution’s balance sheet. HSBC holds Hong Kong’s second stablecoin issuer licence and plans to launch its own token in the second half of 2026, putting both HSBC and Standard Chartered behind the stablecoin model.

“Standard Chartered could have gone the route that all of the other G-SIBs have gone, which is, ‘We’ll do tokenized deposits and we’ll only do intrabank.’ But they didn’t... Hong Kong remains this petri dish for what China might look like in five years, to my mind.”

Simon Taylor

The circulation figure shows how early HKDAP remains. Banks operating in 24/7 markets may need tokenized deposits for activity inside their networks and stablecoins for value that must travel beyond them. Simon’s conclusion was direct: “That means big banks have to support stablecoins.”

LayerZero’s ATLAS Needs Plumbing, Not Throughput

LayerZero has announced ATLAS, a headless exchange engine scheduled to launch later in 2026 on its Zero blockchain. LayerZero says ATLAS achieved sub-millisecond median latency in a test environment designed to resemble public deployment and will initially be provisioned for 200,000 transactions per second at launch.

Thomas Cowan connected the announcement to the less glamorous constraint facing tokenized equities. Current markets require capital to be posted in advance and provide little of the netting available through established clearing infrastructure.

“Right now, everything is pre-funded and there’s very little netting. That is one of the big benefits we have from today’s settlement infrastructure through the DTC and NSCC.”

Thomas Cowan

Thomas’s benchmark creates a useful loop. DTCC is collaborating with LayerZero on Zero’s digital-market infrastructure, while DTC and NSCC provide the netting efficiency ATLAS still needs to reproduce. Citadel Securities has also invested in ZRO and is working with LayerZero on market structure and potential trading, clearing and settlement applications.

Raw speed cannot compensate for absent liquidity.

“I don’t think I’ve seen any data or volume of entirely onchain tokenized stock trades that have been meaningful at all.”

Cuy Sheffield

Market makers, brokers, exchanges and custodians must still concentrate on compatible infrastructure. Thomas said Bullish is focused on getting exchanges, market makers, custodians and brokerages into the same room to agree on three chains they can prioritize over the next year. ATLAS needs to coordinate those institutions and attract trading activity before its throughput becomes commercially relevant.

Fasset’s Funding Shows Why Cheap Launches Need Expensive Controls

Fasset has raised $68 million in an SBI-led Series C at a $1 billion valuation, three months after a $51 million Series B. The company reports more than $40 billion in annualized volume across 125 countries, supported by relationships with banks, telecom operators and payment providers.

Simon saw Fasset’s distribution through banks, telecom operators and payment firms as the hard work behind its reported scale. Asked about the company, Hannah widened the discussion to a broader trend she sees through Turnkey: blockchain-based financial products are reaching large volumes with far fewer employees. The 2010s model put APIs over banks; shared settlement and non-custodial infrastructure lower the staffing requirement again.

Hannah pointed to Axiom, a Solana memecoin trading interface, as an extreme example of organizational compression. By her estimate, it reached roughly $100 million in cumulative revenue in four months with a team of about four people. Later she put it more bluntly, “The headcount-to-volume ratios are getting really crazy”.

It also illustrated the control problem. In February 2026, ZachXBT alleged that Axiom employees had used internal tools to identify private user wallets and discussed trading on that information. Axiom said someone on its team had abused customer-support tools, removed access and opened an investigation.

Simon connected that risk to Synapse. After the banking middleware provider filed for bankruptcy in 2024, differences between its records and partner-bank ledgers froze customer funds. In a June 2024 report, the court-appointed trustee estimated an $85 million shortfall, with customers owed $265 million against $180 million held by partner banks.

“When you’re dealing with moving money, you’re dealing with people’s lives. It’s all very fun vibe coding a neobank, but when you lose somebody’s life savings, things get a lot less fun very quickly.”

Simon Taylor

Cuy expected more global software companies to embed stablecoin accounts and has seen less than anticipated. His example was QuickBooks offering a dollar account and cross-border B2B payments inside software businesses already use. Simon expects the earlier fintech sequence to repeat: consumer neobanks, B2B neobanks, then embedded finance over the next three to four years.

If that sequence holds, stablecoin infrastructure will disappear into payroll, accounting and commerce software. The winners will pair low-cost settlement with distribution and controls that survive the first serious reconciliation failure.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers

This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business or legal advice. These thoughts & opinions and do not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity or sponsor. Any companies or projects mentioned are for illustrative purposes unless specified.

The contents of this newsletter should not be used in any public or private domain without the express permission of the author.

The contents of this newsletter should not be used for any commercial activity, for example - research report, consultancy activity, or paywalled article without the express permission of the author.

Please note, the services and products advertised by our sponsors (by use of terminology such as but not limited to; supported by, sponsored by, Made Possible by or brought to you by) in this newsletter could carry inherent risks and should not be regarded as completely safe or risk-free. Third-party entities provide these services and products, and we do not control, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, efficacy, or safety of their offerings.

It's crucial to provide our readers with clear information regarding the inherent nature of services and products that might be covered in this newsletter, including those advertised by our sponsors from time to time. When you buy cryptoassets (including NFTs) your capital is at risk. Risks associated with cryptoassets include price volatility, loss of capital (the value of your cryptoassets could drop to zero), complexity, lack of regulation and lack of protection. Most service providers operating in the cryptoasset industry do not currently operate in a regulated industry. Therefore, please be aware that when you buy cryptoassets, you are not protected under financial compensation schemes and protections typically afforded to investors when dealing with regulated and authorised entities to operate as financial services firm.