If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!

In this week’s episode, Simon Taylor & Cuy Sheffield are joined by:

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Tokenized here.

📷 Watch on Youtube.

This episode was sponsored by Modern Treasury!

Trusted by companies like Procore, Navan, and Morse, and backed by over $600 billion in payments, learn how to adapt to changing payment rails and scale with confidence at moderntreasury.com

Wells Fargo’s tokenized deposit plan turns an availability upgrade into a balance sheet and operating model question.

Wells Fargo plans to launch tokenized deposits for select corporate and commercial clients this autumn, starting with a limited dollar-to-sterling exchange on its proprietary blockchain. The service is designed for 24/7 movement through existing banking interfaces, with expansion across 2027 to more clients, countries and currencies.

For Cuy Sheffield, the launch reflects a customer expectation that stablecoins have already reset:

But his immediate priority for banks is narrower. Before solving interoperability, banks need to make their own money move 24/7.

He said he would bet that the share of banks capable of moving money around the clock between two customers of the same institution is still “single digit or lower.” By 2030, he expects corporate customers to be far less tolerant of banks that cannot move money between their own accounts outside business hours.

TuongVy then raised the safety-and-soundness question. Wholesale deposits are already hotter than consumer deposits, and Simon pointed to Silicon Valley Bank as the example of how quickly concentrated corporate balances can move. Making those deposits programmable and available around the clock gives banks another liquidity consideration. Simon added the commercial offset - always-on payments create new opportunities for transaction-banking fees.

Then comes the problem outside the bank.

Natalya argued that owning the rail lets Wells Fargo retain the liquidity, client relationship and flow data. But a corporate treasurer banking across JPMorgan, Citi, HSBC, BNY and Wells Fargo could now face multiple tokenized systems across accounts, assets and jurisdictions.

TuongVy warned that banks risk “recreating the exact fragmentation that tokenization and blockchain was supposed to fix”. Her concern is that these systems harden before baseline interoperability standards arrive.

Stablecard gives Western Union a reason to keep earning after the remittance arrives.

Western Union and Rain’s Stablecard is live in 37 markets, with Western Union targeting more than 60 by year-end. Recipients can receive a transfer into a stablecoin wallet, hold the balance and spend it through Visa.

Western Union moved $107.4 billion in cross-border principal in 2025. Natalya’s point was that its remittance economics have historically sat on the sending side, and the transaction ended at payout.

If the recipient holds and spends the balance rather than cashing out, Western Union can earn interchange on volume already passing through its network. Natalya expects that revenue to start small, but it is incremental to the transfer economics.

Then idle balances create yield gravity.

TuongVy said that whenever she sees a stablecoin balance sitting on a platform, she starts asking why it is not earning something. She expects the same pull towards yield-bearing balances to reach remittance and card products. But how that yield is generated changes the regulatory analysis. Yield sourced from an issuer’s balance sheet raises different questions from a non-custodial allocation where the customer retains beneficial ownership.

She linked that distinction to Commissioner Hester Peirce’s July statement on crypto vaults, which said the securities-law analysis depends on the design, activities and degree of managerial discretion involved.

TuongVy also flagged the nearer-term mismatch: card transactions carry chargeback rights while stablecoin settlement can be irreversible. Someone in the stack has to carry that gap when one leg reverses and the other cannot.

For Natalya, gathering AUM was only half the test. The harder question was whether institutions could use the cash without leaving the rail.

Simon introduced two BlackRock launches from the same week. In the US, BlackRock launched tokenized cash products including a new money market fund aimed at digitally native institutional investors and stablecoin reserve management. Separately, it added tokenized share classes to existing European money market funds using Kinexys by J.P. Morgan.

Natalya focused on the friction she had seen with BUIDL. Clients could park assets in the fund, but if they wanted to use that value elsewhere, they still had to offboard back into stablecoins or cash. The AUM could grow while the money remained awkward to redeploy.

Simon pushed that usability point into collateral markets.

His question was whether faster redemption and transfer eventually let collateral follow the position. Could an institution move it from DTC to Euroclear as its requirements change rather than leaving excess collateral parked overnight or through a weekend?

The panel left that open. The prerequisite is more immediate: tokenizing cash solves less if institutions still have to leave the rail every time they want to use it.

Cloudflare’s wallet design moves treasury controls in front of the payment, before an AI agent gets permission to spend.

Cloudflare’s announced model has an account holder create separate virtual wallets for agents, with allowances, allowlists and transaction limits controlling what they can spend. Wallet handles are claimable now, but funding and payment functions are not yet live. Cloudflare’s launch post also does not specify which stablecoins or chains it will support, or name a custodian.

Cuy put the current market size in context. Agentic payment volume today is “so small and immaterial” that it is not happening at scale. He pointed instead to a one-to-three-year horizon for seeing what new business models emerge from the infrastructure being built now.

Natalya focused on treasury. Cloudflare’s design scopes spending caps and permissions to the agent before it transacts. Her argument was that machine-speed spending requires delegated, capped and revocable authority before the payment rather than expense controls afterwards.

For TuongVy, liability still starts with the human mandate.

Her test is whether humans set appropriate permissions, isolated the environment, enforced technical guardrails and monitored the agent. Even well-designed constraints will not make every outcome foreseeable, but they give regulators and courts a decision chain to inspect when something goes wrong.

If the panel is right that the constraint has moved from speed to control, the next round of announcements will be judged on reconciliation and mandate rather than settlement time.

Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!

Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!

Disclaimers