
If you're reading this and still haven't signed up, click the subscribe button below!
This week Simon Taylor & Pet Berisha are joined by:
Charlie You, Co-Founder & CTO, RWA.xyz
Chuk Okpalugo, Author, Stablecoin Blueprint
๐๏ธ Listen to the latest episode of Tokenized here.
๐ท Watch on YouTube.
We Cover:
ICEโs Hyperliquid plan separates regulated access from existing liquidity.
Googleโs custody preview pits procurement advantage against resilience.
SoFiโs banking relationships offer a route to stablecoin payment habits.
HSBCโs RedCoin tests whether a closed loop can grow outward.
SoFi and HSBC expose the economics behind branded stablecoins.
This episode was sponsored by Modern Treasury!

Build products that move money. moderntreasury.com
Trusted by companies like Procore, Navan, and Morse, and backed by over $600 billion in payments, learn how to adapt to changing payment rails and scale with confidence at moderntreasury.com
ICE Can Import Hyperliquidโs Technology, Not Its Liquidity
ICE and Trade[XYZ] plan a U.S. market for 24/7 perpetual futures built on Hyperliquid, subject to CFTC approval. Trade[XYZ] reports over $650 billion in existing-market volume in just over a year.
Pet Berisha noted that 19 months earlier, Hyperliquid had delisted JELLYJELLY, a meme coin, after a squeeze on a $6 million short. People were calling the venue โ13 dudes in a spreadsheet.โ His question was how it got from there to an ICE deal.
Hyperliquid, in the context of this ICE deal, is really just the technology provider.
Charlie You distinguishes Hyperliquidโs technology from the markets built on it. Under the agreement, ICE would operate the regulated markets and Trade[XYZ] would design the contracts, so responsibility for what gets listed sits with them rather than Hyperliquid. Chuk Okpalugo expects separate U.S. books for regulatory reasons, so liquidity has to be rebuilt with regulated participants. For Chuk, this yearโs regulatory alignment creates an opening after years of offshore perps trading, and ICE brings the capital, brand and futures brokers to distribute them. Charlie expects 24/7 trading to push CME and other futures exchanges into round-the-clock markets.
Googleโs Procurement Advantage Still Needs a Resilience Test
Google Cloud is developing MPC-based crypto custody technology for financial institutions. The service is in private preview, with commercial availability planned for early 2027.
For banks already using Google, Charlie sees a way to add digital-asset infrastructure without putting another security-sensitive vendor through procurement. Simon places that opportunity within banksโ wider migration of core systems to the cloud, which he sees as Googleโs way through procurement.
Google already has a lot of [what an enterprise needs] because it is a platform, itโs able to do really fine-grained permissions about who can see what under what policy circumstances.
That procurement advantage doesnโt settle Simonโs concern about resilience. On 20 October, a power failure in Google Cloudโs London region disrupted Revolutโs cards, transfers and app sign-in for hours. For Simon, an existing relationship can make infrastructure easier to buy without establishing that itโs the safest choice.
SoFiโs Distribution Must Become a Payment Habit
SoFi is rolling out SOFIE, its tokenized bank deposit, to U.S. SoFi Crypto members through November. It offers a variable 4.40% APY, as of 20 October, and converts one-for-one into SoFiUSD. Eligible SOFIE deposits carry FDIC protection within standard limits; SoFiUSD does not.
Simon sees the pairing as a model other banks could copy. SoFi can continue attracting deposits to fund lending while giving customers access to stablecoin transfers beyond the bankโs own systems.
For Charlie, the adoption opportunity sits with customers who already use SoFi as their primary bank but arenโt crypto users. Loan refinancing and savings have brought them into the app; stablecoins would reach them through a banking relationship they already trust. Charlieโs attempt to settle up with a friend ran into Venmo and Zelle limits, then a $25 wire fee, before he resorted to begging for stablecoins.
I actually think that this is a really great opportunity for [SoFi] to increase the adoption of stablecoins as a whole.
Chuk sees more immediate value in learning from a production deployment and presumes same-ledger swaps bring efficiencies customers wonโt see. Petโs adoption concern comes before the first payment, because customers outside crypto need a reason to hold stablecoin balances in the first place.
I think that red pilling people into stablecoins is actually much much more difficult than people think it is.
Yield-seeking deposits would demonstrate demand for SOFIE. Repeat payments beyond SoFi would provide stronger evidence for Charlieโs broader stablecoin-adoption case.
HSBCโs PayMe Launch Leaves the Institutional Test Ahead
HSBC launched RedCoin, a Hong Kong dollar stablecoin, inside its PayMe app on 23 October, with wallet activation over subsequent days for PayMeโs roughly 3.3 million users and access to more than 100,000 merchants, per HSBC.
[RedCoin is] not interchangeable with your existing HSBC account. Itโs only within the PayMe ecosystem. It could be a database.
Chukโs objection is a single-validator deployment confined to PayMe and separate from existing HSBC accounts, although he credits the learning involved. Simon recalls Cash App and Robinhoodโs closed-loop Bitcoin beginnings and suspects PayMeโs separate modern infrastructure could support wider HSBC deployment.
Asked about non-dollar demand, Charlie says the data shows dollar stablecoins gaining share, while euro stablecoins fell from roughly 1% or 2% at their peak to tens of basis points. He treats RedCoin as a local payments experiment.
HSBC says wholesale, corporate and institutional uses come next.
A Branded Stablecoin Has to Earn More Than a Press Release
For Chuk, SoFi and HSBC illustrate a sequence of commercial choices.
Establish why customers hold balances on the platform.
Choose the liability. SoFi wanted to own it, so a tokenized deposit fit. HSBC chose a stablecoin, though Chuk suspects its reserve balances still look like deposits.
Decide whose stablecoin based on economics and the value of a branded press release. Only then ask whether users need to move money elsewhere.
Simonโs test is the yield. A branded coin could work like a deposit, letting a platform collect yield as a quasi narrow bank. If an existing stablecoin passes that yield through instead, he sees little reason to put your own name on it.
One of the worst things I think you can do is give your stablecoin a name because I donโt know how many people walk around giving names to each individual dollar bill. Hey, hey, Steve. Hey, Tracy.
Chuk wants to stop checking whether a friend can receive ACH before paying them, and credits Cash App with getting closest.
My balance is just my balance, and all I ask is how you want to receive it, and the platform handles the rest.
If interoperability gets solved, Chukโs logic leaves platforms able to earn yield without their own coin, while consumer firms weigh a branding payoff they canโt yet measure.
Thanks so much for reading the Tokenized Newsletter!
Please share this edition or share it with your colleagues if you enjoyed it!
Disclaimers
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial, business or legal advice. These thoughts & opinions do not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity or sponsor. Any companies or projects mentioned are for illustrative purposes unless specified.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used in any public or private domain without the express permission of the author.
The contents of this newsletter should not be used for any commercial activity, for example - research report, consultancy activity, or paywalled article without the express permission of the author.
Please note, the services and products advertised by our sponsors (by use of terminology such as but not limited to; supported by, sponsored by, Made Possible by or brought to you by) in this newsletter could carry inherent risks and should not be regarded as completely safe or risk-free. Third-party entities provide these services and products, and we do not control, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, efficacy, or safety of their offerings.
It's crucial to provide our readers with clear information regarding the inherent nature of services and products that might be covered in this newsletter, including those advertised by our sponsors from time to time. When you buy cryptoassets (including NFTs) your capital is at risk. Risks associated with cryptoassets include price volatility, loss of capital (the value of your cryptoassets could drop to zero), complexity, lack of regulation and lack of protection. Most service providers operating in the cryptoasset industry do not currently operate in a regulated industry. Therefore, please be aware that when you buy cryptoassets, you are not protected under financial compensation schemes and protections typically afforded to investors when dealing with regulated and authorised entities to operate as financial services firm.

